Sitelines, L.L.C. v. Pentstar Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Judge.
Defendant subcontractor appeals from the entry of summary judgment in plaintiff contractor’s favor. It asserts that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss or compel arbitration because, it claims, it was entitled to arbitration under federal law. We affirm.
On August 21, 2004, plaintiff, Sitelines, L.L.C., a contractor and a limited liability company organized under Missouri law, and defendant, Pentstar Corporation, a subcontractor and a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Minnesota, entered into a contract entitled…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Albert J. Hoppe, Inc. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Wilkes v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Nitro Distributing, Inc. v. DunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Kansas City Urology, P.A. v. United Healthcare ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Swofford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Allen ex rel. Allen v. GatewoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Scharf v. KoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.