Legal Opinion

Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 21, 2006No. SC 86741PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.

I. Introduction

The City of Kansas City, Missouri, appeals from a judgment in mandamus directing that it grant a preliminary plat to Furlong Companies, Inc. and awarding actual damages of $224,871.00 and attorney’s fees in the amount of $148,435.20 against the city under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 arising from the denial of the plat. The city complains that the trial court improperly engaged in de novo review applicable to noncontested case matters under the Missouri Administrative Procedure Act. Section 536.150. 1 The city contends that the review should have been…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Morton v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Hagely v. Board of Education of Webster Groves School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Phipps v. School District of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. City of Cabool v. Missouri State Board of MediationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Todd Hewitt, Relator v. Honorable Kristine Kerr, Judge, Circuit Court for St. Louis County, MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  2. United States Department of Veterans Affairs v. BoresiSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. Gash v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. STATE EX REL. VALENTINE v. OrrSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. State Ex Rel. McKee v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API