Legal Opinion

Keven Windel and Marlene Windel v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2021No. S17159PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA KEVEN WINDEL and MARLENE ) WINDEL, ) Supreme Court No. S-17159 ) Appellants, ) Superior Court No. 3PA-15-02151 CI ) v. ) OPINION ) MATANUSKA-SUSITNA ) No. 7560 – October 8, 2021 BOROUGH, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court of the State of Alaska,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Calhoun v. GreeningAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Reed v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Williams v. BarbeeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Angleton v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Societe Financial, LLC d/b/a Alaska ATM, and James Dainis, individually v. MJ Corporation d/b/a Shell and 15th GrillAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Bullock v. Wells Fargo Bank, naDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2024
  3. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation v. MatthewsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API