Legal Opinion
Holman v. Cox
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1979No. 15883PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
Appellant was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, and his driver’s license was revoked for his refusal to submit to a chemical test pursuant to the Utah Implied Consent Law, § 41-6-44.10 U.C.A.1 This appeal is from the district court’s af-firmance of the revocation determination made by the State Department of Public Safety.
Appellant contends that, having been read his Miranda2 rights and at nearly the same time having been asked to take a chemical test without advice of counsel, he wa,s not clear as to his legal rights under the circumstances. His refusal to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State, Department of Highways v. BeckeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. SeverinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Wiseman v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Conrad v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. EastUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Salt Lake City v. WomackUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Sandy City v. LarsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.