Legal Opinion

Kane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2003PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTodd, J.

¶ 1 In this class action,1 Appellants, who are home owner’s insurance policy holders and who have sued on their own behalf and as representatives of classes of similarly situated persons, ask us to review the order entered in the Berks County Court of Common Pleas sustaining the preliminary objections in the nature of. a demurrer filed by the Appellee insurers. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

¶ 2 As this appeal comes to us following the sustaining of preliminary objections against Appellants, the following background is gleaned from Appellants’ amended complaint.2 Appellants…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. FabinyiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. PerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Mee v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Pro MacHineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Burton v. Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Brown v. Everett Cash Mutual Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API