United States ex rel. Search v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Pottawatomie County. STATEMENT OP THE CASE. This is an injunction proceeding in which the plaintiff below, plaintiff in error here, prayed that an injunction be issued commanding each and every of the defendants, their officers, servants, employes, agents, contractors and workmen and all persons acting for or representing the defendants, to refrain from any further construction, or completing, a railroad described in the bill of complaint…
Read the full summary
Error from the District Court of Pottawatomie County. STATEMENT OP THE CASE. This is an injunction proceeding in which the plaintiff below, plaintiff in error here, prayed that an injunction be issued commanding each and every of the defendants, their officers, servants, employes, agents, contractors and workmen and all persons acting for or representing the defendants, to refrain from any further construction, or completing, a railroad described in the bill of complaint upon the line of its proposed location, as shown by a map filed in the office of the secretary of the interior in the year…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McAtee, J.:
Various motions were filed by the defendant company in this court in this case, after the filing of the petition in error and transcript of i*ecord here, upon June 6, 1895. Under the direction of the court, these motions were argued orally, and upon printed briefs in connection with the argument upon *450the merits of the case as presented in the transcript of the record, and will be here reviewed.
The defendant railroad company filed its motion on June 24, 1895, in this court, to require the plaintiffs to make a deposit and…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Buttz v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ahren-Ott Mfg. Co. v. CondonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Noble v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Churchill v. Choctaw Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- State Ex Rel. Ruth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.