Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ruth v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1926No. 17764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRANSON, Y. O. J.

Herein is-presented error from the district court of Oklahoma county. The cause as filed in said court is styled “State of Oklahoma ex rel. C. H. Ruth, Relator, v. Art Walker, W. C. McAlister, and Claud Baker, as the State Election Board of the State of Oklahoma, and C. C. Childers, Respondents.” The parties are referred to, therefore, as relator and respondents.

The judgment of the district court denied the relator the relief sought. He therefore prosecutes error, and the cause in this court is styled as in the court below.

The cause was filed in the trial court on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. United States ex rel. Search v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Tecumseh v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. United States v. SeymourDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API