Churchill v. Choctaw Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Canadian County. Injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.:
On the 17th day of July, 1890, the plaintiff filed a petition before Hon. A. J. Seay, then judge of the Second judicial district of Oklahoma Territory, alleging that the defendant company, under and by virtue of an act of congress, approved February 18, 1888, and as amended February 13, 1889, was constructing a railroad across the southeast quarter of section eighteen, township twelve, north of range five, east of the Indian meridian, in Canadian county, Oklahoma Territory, which land the plaintiff had filed upon as a homestead on the 30th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bybee v. Oregon & California RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- United States ex rel. Search v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Noble v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Board of Bond Trustees of Special Road & Bridge District No. 1Supreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Noble v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Western Stockyards Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912