Legal Opinion

Millikan v. Crail

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1912No. 21,991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom Howard Circuit Court; Lex J. Kirlcpatrich, Judge. Action by Ira P. Crail and others against Prank M. Millikan and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This action was brought by appellees to foreclose assessments made against certain lots belonging to appellants, for the improvement of a street in the city of Kokomo on which they abutted. The court found the facts specially, and stated its conclusion of law thereon, which was favorable to appellees, and rendered judgment for them accordingly. Prom this judgment this appeal was taken by appellants, who, by proper assignments of error, challenge the sufficiency of the complaint, the correctness of the conclusion of law, and the ruling of the court in denying their motion for a new trial.

1. It…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Weaver v. TemplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Garvin v. DaussmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bass v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Escott v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Mead Construction Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Risley v. RumbleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API