Legal Opinion

Garvin v. Daussman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1888No. 13,232PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

Jacob Daussman and Henry Alexander, partners under the firm name of Jacob Daussman & Co., complained of Thomas E. Garvin, and alleged that they had been awarded the contract for the improvement of a certain street in the city of Evansville, which improvement it is averred had been regularly ordered, and the contract therefor duly let, by the common council of the city. The plaintiffs claimed that they had fully executed their contract and completed the improvement, and that the cost thereof had been duly estimated, apportioned and assessed as the law requires.

It is averred that the defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Ricketts v. SprakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. City of Birmingham v. WillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API