State v. Seggerman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for conspiracy to commit theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055 1 ; ORS 161.450. 2 He assigns error to the sentencing court’s order of restitution. We review for errors of law, ORS 138.222(4)(a), 3 and affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing.
We take the undisputed facts from the record. Defendant managed a convenience store owned by the Bonbright Oil Company (Bonbright). On or about November 19, 1997, defendant agreed with an accomplice, Phillip Boling, that the two would stage a robbery at the store. Defendant stated that he agreed to stage the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. KappelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. SigmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. HowettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.