Legal Opinion

State v. Seggerman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2000No. CF98-0256; CA A102865PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for conspiracy to commit theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055 1 ; ORS 161.450. 2 He assigns error to the sentencing court’s order of restitution. We review for errors of law, ORS 138.222(4)(a), 3 and affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing.

We take the undisputed facts from the record. Defendant managed a convenience store owned by the Bonbright Oil Company (Bonbright). On or about November 19, 1997, defendant agreed with an accomplice, Phillip Boling, that the two would stage a robbery at the store. Defendant stated that he agreed to stage the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. KappelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. SigmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. HowettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API