Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Pavlikowski

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1978No. 10240PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*441OPINION

By the Court,

Manoukian, J.:

This is a suit for professional malpractice. The petitioner was the attorney in an uncontested divorce action in which the parties had previously agreed to the terms of a settlement. One term of the agreement was that the husband, Thomas N. Gris-wold, the unnamed real party in interest in the instant matter, was to pay $3,600 in alimony over the course of one year.

Petitioner attorney, however, failed to incorporate the time limitation in either the divorce complaint, hearing, or decree *442and further failed to insert language permitting the court to retain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Laakonen v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Smith v. HamiltonNevada Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ridenour v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API