Sorenson v. Pavlikowski
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*441OPINION
By the Court,
Manoukian, J.:
This is a suit for professional malpractice. The petitioner was the attorney in an uncontested divorce action in which the parties had previously agreed to the terms of a settlement. One term of the agreement was that the husband, Thomas N. Gris-wold, the unnamed real party in interest in the instant matter, was to pay $3,600 in alimony over the course of one year.
Petitioner attorney, however, failed to incorporate the time limitation in either the divorce complaint, hearing, or decree *442and further failed to insert language permitting the court to retain…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Laakonen v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Smith v. HamiltonNevada Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by34 opinions
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Ridenour v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.