Legal Opinion
Business Bank v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 30, 2009No. A07-1832PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether a mortgage in favor of appellant The Business Bank (“Business Bank”) complies with Minnesota’s Mortgage Registry Tax statute, Minn.Stat. §§ 287.01-13 (2008). The district court found that the mortgage was valid and ruled that the mortgage had priority over another later-filed lien. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the mortgage was invalid because it did not comply with Minn.Stat. § 287.03 (2008). 1 Business Bank v. Hanson, No. A07-1832, 2008 WL 4705172, at *8-10 (Minn.App. Oct.28, 2008). Because we conclude that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Winne v. LahartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Katch, LLC v. SweetserDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- In re Individual 35W Bridge LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Bearder v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Roemhildt v. Kristall Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Asian Women United of Minnesota v. LeiendeckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.