Legal Opinion

Detroit Southern Railroad v. Malcomson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1906No. Docket No. 50PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by the Detroit Southern Railroad Company against Alexander Y. Malcomson for freight charges. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for the freight upon certain cars of coal shipped to defendant over plaintiff’s railroad by the Superior Coal Company, of Wellston, Ohio, under a contract containing the following clauses:

*173“Contract with Dealers.
“Made at Detroit, this 1st day of July, 1901, between the Superior Coal Co., Wellston, O., the first party, and A. Y. Malcomson, of Detroit, Mich., the second party.
“ Said first party agrees to furnish all the coal that may be required by said second party, for the use of The Edison Illuminating Co., of Detroit (with whom the said second party has annual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vogt v. SchienebeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Althouse v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Lawson v. HobbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  3. International Co. v. Sun-Maid Raisin GrowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Lodwick Lumber Co. v. E. A. Butt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Western Casualty & Suretty Co. v. City of Garden CityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API