Legal Opinion

People v. Slate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1977No. Docket 24804PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O. B. Bivins, Jr., J.

Defendant Slate, along with codefendants Hunter and Thomas, was charged with receiving and concealing stolen property, the value of which exceeded $100, contrary to MCLA 750.535; MSA 28.803. All three codefendants were charged in the same information. Codefendants Hunter and Thomas only were also charged with armed robbery in a separate information. The trial court, pursuant to a motion by the prosecutor, granted a joinder of the informations for trial over the objection of defendant Slate. On June 11, 1975, the jury convicted defendant Slate and codefendant Thomas of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. McKinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. People v. SchramMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. CarrollMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MissouriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. StricklinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. AtkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. MatujaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. Walter MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API