Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Rubio

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1993No. Nos. 92-CA-56, 92-CA-76PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frederick N. Young, Judge.

This is an appeal by Ronald Cummins, appellant, from a summary judgment rendered against him by the trial court. Appellant had suffered a knife injury inflicted by Daniel R. Rubio, Jr. outside a liquor establishment owned by Chicago Louie’s, Inc., and operated by a William Marsh and a Michael Marsh, appellees. Appellant had sued all four of these parties. The trial court rendered summary judgment in favor of the latter three and dismissed them from the action, leaving appellant’s claim pending only against his immediate attacker, Daniel R. Rubio, Jr.

The facts of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mason v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colburn v. MaynardOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Johnson v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Smith v. S.P. Greenville Inn, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Studer v. Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 3767Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Hoeflinger v. AM Mart, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API