Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co. v. Couch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 1930No. 19406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAEFER, O.

The parties occupy the same relation as in the trial court, and will be herein referred to as plaintiff and defendants.

This is an action brought by plaintiff upon a promissory note for $1,048, with a credit of $186.92. A copy of the note was attached, to the petition which shows a provision therein as follows:

“Upon payment of this note in full in cash on or before 9-1-26, a discount of $52.40 will be allowed.”

Defendants answered; admitted the execution of the note, and, in substance, alleged payment of all of said note on or prior to September 1, 1926, except the sum of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kingkade v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Murphy v. Schuster Springs Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Rupard v. ReesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Smith v. LobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API