Legal Opinion
Smith v. Lobb
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1917No. Civ. No. 2033PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from an order granting a motion for a new trial in an action for conversion after verdict and judgment for defendants.
The plaintiff and defendant George Lobb had entered into a lease, under which Lobb, the lessor, might on the 1st of December of any year during the life of the lease terminate it by paying to the plaintiff, the lessee, such amount as might be due him for certain reclaiming and leveeing work which the lease provided he was to do and for which he was to he paid a stipulated sum per acre. The amount that was due the plaintiff on December 1, 1913,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Becker v. . BoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Rhorer v. BilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Mitchell v. Vermont Copper Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Colton v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Noyes v. Habitation Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co. v. CouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Noyes v. Habitation Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975