Legal Opinion

Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1931No. D-420PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

June 28, 1919, plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract for the construction of an extension to the power *756plant at Ind.ianb.ead, Maryland. The price fixed for the work specified in the contract, as originally made, was $250,572, and the contract was to be completed in all of its parts within 200 days from July 26,1919, the date on which a copy of the contract was delivered to the plaintiff, or on February 11, 1920. The defendant paid plaintiff a total of $310,832.75, consisting of the full contract price of $250,-572, plus the cost of changes and extras as determined by the Bureau…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCloskey ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Mundy v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  4. McClintic-Marshall Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  5. Goldstone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Darwin Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Haney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API