Legal Opinion

New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Sheeley

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action by the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company against Williám Sheeley and others. Defendants move to dissolve an injunction restraining them from entering on plaintiff’s station grounds at the city of Niagara Falls. Denied.

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

This action was brought to restrain the defendants from entering upon the plaintiff’s station grounds at the city of Niagara Falls. The complaint and affidavits upon which the injunction herein was granted, and the papers used on this motion, if true, establish a right to the relief prayed for. The plaintiff is a railroad corporation and the defendants are hackmen. The plain*186tiff. has'offered, and still offers, to admit the defendants to the privileges of. its station grounds at Niagara Balls upon their complying with the terms and conditions exacted by the plaintiff. The defendants have not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . StarinNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Livingston v. LivingstonNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  4. Old Colony Railroad v. TrippMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Barney v. Oyster Bay & Huntington Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  2. Hedding v. GallagherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  3. Lucas v. HerbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. RyanNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  5. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. v. BorkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API