Legal Opinion

N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. v. Bork

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 22, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Trespass Quare Clausum. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

This is an action of trespass quare clausum fregit, charging specially that on December 3, 1900, at Providence, the defendant “broke and entered the plaintiff’s said buildings and with force and arms at said Providence broke and entered upon the plaintiff’s said land and therein and thereon against the prohibition of the plaintiff remained and therein and thereon against the prohibition of the plaintiff, solicited, invited and sought passengers and business as a driver of a hack for hire and therein and thereon with force and arms remained so soliciting, although directed by the plaintiff to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fluker v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Barney v. Oyster Bay & Huntington Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Kates v. Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. ScovillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  2. Oregon Short Line R. v. DavidsonUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API