District of Columbia v. Tarlosky
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
The Superior Court granted summary judgment to appellees, who are retired members of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), with respect to their claim that a legislatively approved 4.2% increase in the salaries of active members of the MPD, denominated a “retention allowance,” entitled appellees (“retirees”) to a corresponding 4.2% increase in the retirement payments pursuant to the “equalization” provision of the District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement and Disability Act (the Act), D.C.Code §§ 4r-601 to -634 (1994). On appeal, the District…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lanier v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Jones & Associates, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by16 opinions
- Floyd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- O'Rourke v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- District of Columbia v. GouldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gause v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Andrews v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.