Gause v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:
In this case, we convened en banc to consider whether the District of Columbia Jury System Act (“DCJSA”),1 which includes a statutory right to inspect court records used in connection with the jury selection process, requires a predicate showing that the requested materials -will ultimately yield evidence of a “substantial failure to comply with” the DCJSA. We decline to impose a threshold showing requirement, because to do so would undermine the DCJSA’s stated purpose by creating an unnecessary hurdle for litigants seeking discovery of jury pool information…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-CotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Test v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jonathan Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re Petition of A.O.T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Azariah Israel & Ronald Marquet Cheadle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re M.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.