Legal Opinion

Gause v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 2010No. 06-CF-20, 06-CF-47PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:

In this case, we convened en banc to consider whether the District of Columbia Jury System Act (“DCJSA”),1 which includes a statutory right to inspect court records used in connection with the jury selection process, requires a predicate showing that the requested materials -will ultimately yield evidence of a “substantial failure to comply with” the DCJSA. We decline to impose a threshold showing requirement, because to do so would undermine the DCJSA’s stated purpose by creating an unnecessary hurdle for litigants seeking discovery of jury pool information…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-CotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Test v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jonathan Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. In re Petition of A.O.T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  3. Azariah Israel & Ronald Marquet Cheadle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In re M.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API