State v. Dash
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, C.J.
¶1 Reversal is required where the “to-convict” instruction permits the jury to convict the defendant based solely upon acts committed beyond the statutory limitation period. The “to-convict” jury instruction given in Tyrone Dash’s trial permitted the jury to convict Dash without finding that he had committed any criminal act within the statutory limitation period. Accordingly, we reverse Dash’s conviction and remand for a new trial.
I
¶2 Frances Taylor was 88 years old when she met Dash in early 2000. At that time, she owned two apartment buildings and her own home. She had investment accounts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ReederWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. O'CainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. MehrabianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. PeltierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.