Legal Opinion

State v. Reeder

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2015No. 90577-1PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 — Michael J. Reeder appeals a published Court of Appeals decision affirming his conviction on 14 counts of securities fraud and 14 counts of theft in the first degree. We granted review of two issues.

|2 First, Reeder claims that subpoenas duces tecum1 issued by a special inquiry judge (SIJ) to financial institutions for Reeder’s private bank records violated his constitutional rights under article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. Suspecting Reeder of securities fraud and *810theft, the prosecuting attorney sought a subpoena from an SIJ to obtain Reeder’s private bank records.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Darrell D. ClassenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. State Of Washington v. William Witkowski & Tina BervenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. State v. VillelaWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State Of Washington v. David NovickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. BNSF Ry. Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API