State v. Reeder
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 — Michael J. Reeder appeals a published Court of Appeals decision affirming his conviction on 14 counts of securities fraud and 14 counts of theft in the first degree. We granted review of two issues.
|2 First, Reeder claims that subpoenas duces tecum1 issued by a special inquiry judge (SIJ) to financial institutions for Reeder’s private bank records violated his constitutional rights under article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. Suspecting Reeder of securities fraud and *810theft, the prosecuting attorney sought a subpoena from an SIJ to obtain Reeder’s private bank records.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Darrell D. ClassenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. William Witkowski & Tina BervenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State v. VillelaWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State Of Washington v. David NovickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- BNSF Ry. Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.