Legal Opinion

Bullcoming v. New Mexico

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 2011No. 09-10876PublishedCited by 955 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

[564 U.S. 651]

Justice Ginsburg

delivered the opinion of the Court, except as to Part IV and footnote 6.†

In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 129 S. Ct. 2527, 174 L. Ed. 2d 314 (2009), this Court held that a forensic laboratory report stating that a suspect substance was cocaine ranked as testimonial for purposes of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. The report had been created specifically to serve as evidence in a criminal proceeding. Absent stipulation, the Court ruled, the prosecution may not introduce such a report without offering a live witness…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by955 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

950 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API