Frady v. Ivester
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Marion.
Action for the recovery of two tracts of land; one containing 100 acres, and the other 50 acres. Broadly, the case made is this:
The common source of title is Elizabeth E. Tate. The plaintiffs claim the 100-acre tract as the heirs-at-law of one Amanda Frady, deceased, who at the death of Elizabeth E. Tate is alleged to have taken the whole of , the 100 acres as an heir-at-law of said Elizabeth E. Tate, deceased. Two of the plaintiffs claim the 50-acre tract by virtue of a deed of conveyance from Elizabeth E. Tate.
The defendant in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peshine v. OrdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Garrett v. WeinbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
- Sutton v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Ouzts v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Frady v. IvesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Knight v. HiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Mullis v. WinchesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Graniteville Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Ham v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- May v. JeterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.