Legal Opinion

Frady v. Ivester

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1924No. 11576PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

Action for the recovery of two tracts of land; one containing 100 acres, and the other 50 acres. Broadly, the case made is this:

The common source of title is Elizabeth E. Tate. The plaintiffs claim the 100-acre tract as the heirs-at-law of one Amanda Frady, deceased, who at the death of Elizabeth E. Tate is alleged to have taken the whole of , the 100 acres as an heir-at-law of said Elizabeth E. Tate, deceased. Two of the plaintiffs claim the 50-acre tract by virtue of a deed of conveyance from Elizabeth E. Tate.

The defendant in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Peshine v. OrdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Garrett v. WeinbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  3. Sutton v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Ouzts v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  5. Frady v. IvesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knight v. HiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  2. Mullis v. WinchesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Graniteville Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Ham v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. May v. JeterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API