Legal Opinion

Peshine v. Ord

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1897No. L. A. No. 252PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. B. T. Williams, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Action to quiet title to a portion of a certain lot Ho. 97, outside lands of the town of Santa Barbara. On January 29, 1875, James L. Ord, then the owner of said lot 97, executed a deed purporting to convey the whole thereof to one Robert B. Ord, his brother, for the expressed consideration of fifteen hundred dollars. On August 20, 1875, in an action of divorce between said James and his wife, Augustias de la Guerra de Ord, the former district court rendered a decree whereby, in terms, a tract of eighteen acres off the west side of said lot—approximately one-half of the same—was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Brandt v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cline v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Warder v. EnslenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Henderson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API