Ham v. Flowers
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
This appeal involves • two actions in equity which are closely interrelated and, by consent of the parties, were consolidated in the Court below. Each suit was brought to redeem a tract of land from a mortgage and for an accounting of the rents arid prbfits. , ’ -
On Match 31, 1920, appellant, S. Joseph Ham, for the purpose of obtaining, supplies for 1920, executed and delivered to one W. Q. Flowers a mortgage for $1,000.00 covering 24 1/2 acres of land. The record does not disclose the date of maturity. Apparently the supplies furnished exceeded the amount of the mortgage and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Becker v. . McCreaNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Frady v. IvesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Frady v. IvesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Bradley v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Knight v. HiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Chambers of South Carolina, Inc. v. County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Privette v. GarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- All Saints Parish v. Protestant Episcopal Church in DioceseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Jannino v. JanninoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.