Legal Opinion

Frady v. Ivester

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 19, 1921No. 10787PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chies Justice Gary.

The record shows that the issue of title was raised by the pleadings, as to which either the plaintiffs or the defendant had the right to demand a trial by a jury; but that it was waived.

The appellant’s first exception assigns error on the part of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, in refusing to allow the plaintiffs’ attorney to amend the complaint. He has failed to satisfy this Court that there was prejudicial error. The exception is. therefore overruled.

The argument of the appellants’ attorney contains this statement:

“The other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGee v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  2. Garrett v. WeinbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  3. Sims v. SteadmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. Navassa Guano Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. Ihley v. PadgettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. MonteithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Ham v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. All Saints Parish v. Protestant Episcopal Church in DioceseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Frady v. IvesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API