Legal Opinion

Flood v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1986No. B007332PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Minor appellant Melissa Flood 1 appeals from a dismissal following a judgment upon the pleadings in favor of respondent Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. (Wyeth). Appellant received a combined diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough) and tetanus (DPT) immunization, which allegedly caused her severe brain damage. Wyeth was the manufacturer of the vaccine. She sued Wyeth for negligence and strict products liability. The trial court found Wyeth immune from liability pursuant to Health & Safety Code section 429.36. While cognizant of the liability problem caused by vaccines which cannot be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Savina v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Kirby v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Savina v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API