Legal Opinion
Toner v. Lederle Laboratories
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1987No. 16453Published
1Opinion of the Court
732 P.2d 297 (1987)
112 Idaho 328
David TONER, guardian ad litem for Kevin Toner, an infant child, and David Toner and Susan Toner, husband and wife, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
LEDERLE LABORATORIES, A DIVISION OF AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., Defendant-Respondent.
No. 16453.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
February 4, 1987.
Kenneth L. Pedersen (argued) and Curtis Webb, Twin Falls, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Robert J. Koontz (argued), William J. Batt and Catherine A. King, Boise, for Lederle Laboratories.
Phillip M. Barber, Boise and Malcolm E. Wheeler (argued), Los Angeles, CA, for amicus curiae,…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Huntley; Concurrence · Shepard.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Carroll Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.