Bonney v. Upjohn Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS W. HILLMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have sued The Upjohn Company, Inc., alleging personal injuries from ingesting Lincocin, an antibiotic drug manufactured by the defendant. Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment alleging plaintiffs’ claims were not timely filed.
1. THE FACTS.
Plaintiff, Wallace Bonney, was injured in a work related accident in 1956 while employed with the H. L. Lockrow Co. He remained unemployed for about a year as a result of a spinal compression fracture and collected workmen’s compensation. He later returned to Lockrow and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pennwalt Corp. v. NasiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Bonney v. the Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cook v. United States (In Re Earl Roggenbuck Farms, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- Much v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1980
- MacK v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.