Legal Opinion
Kaneko v. Yager
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 2004No. B170037PublishedCited by 4 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Etsuko Kaneko (plaintiff) appeals from a summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) in favor of Yumi Yager and Hiroko Asano (defendants). Probate Code1 section 4303, subdivision (a) provides, under specified circumstances, an immunity to third persons who in good faith rely on a power of attorney. In the published portion of this opinion, we will discuss the effect of the section 4303, subdivision (a) immunity on two powers of attorney, one special and the other general. We conclude that a special power of attorney executed by plaintiff on February 22, 2001,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Continental Insurance v. Columbus Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Austin v. CrystalTech Web HostingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Title Trust Deed Service Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Kaneko v. YagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2025