Legal Opinion
Kaneko v. Yager
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 2004No. B170037Published
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
16 Cal.Rptr.3d 183 (2004)
120 Cal.App.4th 970
Etsuko KANEKO, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Yumi YAGER et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B170037.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five.
July 22, 2004.
Hitchcock, Bowman & Schachter, Robert Schachter, Torrance, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
John H. Sibbison III, Redondo Beach, for Defendants and Respondents.
Certified for Partial Publication.[*]
TURNER, P.J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Etsuko Kaneko (plaintiff) appeals from a summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) in favor of Yumi Yager and Hiroko Asano (defendants). Probate Code[1] section 4303,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Continental Insurance v. Columbus Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.