Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Columbus Line, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 2003No. B157323PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. Introduction

Defendant, Columbus Line, Inc., appeals from a $189,328 judgment, plus interest, entered after a court trial. The trial court found defendant was liable for $189,328, plus interest, for damage to a yacht mast owned by America True. The action was brought by plaintiff, Continental Insurance Co., the mast owner’s insurer. Plaintiff filed a summary adjudication motion challenging defendant’s sixth affirmative defense. We conclude: plaintiff failed to sustain its summary adjudication burden of production; the summary adjudication motion should have been denied;…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Henley v. Marine TransportionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Borrayo v. AveryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. TrafficSchoolOnline, Inc. v. ClarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Citizens for Odor Nuisance Abatement v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Kaneko v. YagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Abco, LLC v. EversleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API