Legal Opinion

Harper v. Crockett

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 26, 1994No. LR-C-93-549PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, District Judge.

ORDER

Defendant, James C. Crockett, has filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff alleges violations of his constitutional rights. Defendant denies the allegations, contending that plaintiffs rights were not violated, and that the police department regulations at issue were not unconstitutionally overbroad or vague. Defendant’s motion will be granted, for the reasons stated below.

SYLLABUS

I. BACKGROUND...................................................... 1563

II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT............................................. 1564

III. FIRST AMENDMENT ANALYSIS OF…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HookstraNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Melton v. Forrest City Arkansas, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2023
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API