Harper v. Crockett
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, District Judge.
ORDER
Defendant, James C. Crockett, has filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff alleges violations of his constitutional rights. Defendant denies the allegations, contending that plaintiffs rights were not violated, and that the police department regulations at issue were not unconstitutionally overbroad or vague. Defendant’s motion will be granted, for the reasons stated below.
SYLLABUS
I. BACKGROUND...................................................... 1563
II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT............................................. 1564
III. FIRST AMENDMENT ANALYSIS OF…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HookstraNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
- Melton v. Forrest City Arkansas, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2023
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006