Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided March 1, 2006Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Jim Argue, Jr. State Representative 5905 Forest Place, #210 Little Rock, Arkansas 72207-5245
Dear Representative Argue:
This letter is a response to your request for an opinion regarding various issues arising out of Act 664 of 1995. Act 664 of 1995 states in pertinent part:
SECTION 1. When any municipal official or municipal employee age fifty-five (55) or over who is vested in the retirement system retires, the official or employee may continue to participate in the municipality's health care plan as long as the official or employee pays both employer and employee contributions…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hamm v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- City of Little Rock v. RainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.