Legal Opinion
In Re Frank H.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 3, 1998No. 1CA-JV98-0055, 1CA-JV98-0056, 1CA-JV98-0057, 1CA-JV98-0058, 1CA-JV98-0079, 1CA-J V98-0088, 1CA-JV98-0097, 1CA-JV98-0104PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Judge
¶ 1 This appeal is a consolidation of eight eases arising out of juvenile court. In each case, the state alleges that the court erred by setting a deadline for victims to assert claims for restitution from the juvenile. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial courts’ decisions.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Each of the eight cases in this appeal involves one juvenile who has been adjudicated delinquent. The specific facts that gave rise to the juveniles’ delinquency are not at issue here. In each case, the state alleged that the juvenile’s delinquent actions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- In re D.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. LambertonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Alton D.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Michelle G.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re Richard B.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- In Re Alton D.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. UNKEFERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.