Ramsay v. Meade
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Weld County. Eon. Christian A. Bennett, Judge. On Rehearing. Action by David R. Meade against Charles H. Ramsay. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Original opinion withdrawn.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
We are satisfied that justice demands an affirmance of the-judgment. If the rules of appellate practice were rigidly enforced against appellant, it is doubtful if he could, as a matter of strict right, ask this court to consider and pass upon any of the objections urged against the judgment, but some of them, perhaps, should be considered and definitely determined.
We observe, first, that this contract is not merely one of personal service, though provision is made therein for a salary to' Meade for managing the firm business. Taken as a whole, the contract, if executed, created a partnership.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Treat v. HilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chowning v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Richardson v. KeelySupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Larsen v. Consolidated Pet Foods, Inc. (In Re S & D Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Smuggler-Union Mining Co. v. KentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Lorraine Manufacturing Co. v. Allen Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.