Legal Opinion
Smuggler-Union Mining Co. v. Kent
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 15, 1910No. 6188PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from San Miguel District Court — Hon. Thercn Stevens, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
The plaintiffs, who allege that they are lessees of the Carruthers lode mining claim in San Miguel county, brought this action against The Smuggler-Union Mining Company, the alleged lessor, for damages occasioned by their wrongful eviction by the lessor, and obtained a judgment from which defendant appeals. The assignment of errors contains many specifications. As the judgment must be reversed because it is not based upon sufficient legal evidence, only the objection on this ground and such other specifications as might be material in the event of a new trial will be considered.
1. After the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boston & Albany Railroad v. O'ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Montana Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Armstrong v. LowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Milheim v. BaxterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoover v. ShottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Boyle v. BaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Utex Exploration Company v. Archie Garwood, R. C. Gerlach and W. E. BozmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Austin v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Lorraine Manufacturing Co. v. Allen Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925