Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Trueblood
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 31, 1980No. 79-2525PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs, Hervey and Gilbert Johnson, and their Chicago attorney, Myron M. Cherry, appeal an order of the district court revoking Cherry’s pro hac vice status. The facts of the underlying suit between the plaintiffs and the various defendants are set out in our opinion in the separate appeal in Johnson v. Trueblood, 629 F.2d 287 (3d Cir.1980). On July 3, 1979, the jury gave a verdict for the defendants. On July 6, the notice of appeal was filed in No. 79-1892. On July 19, with out any prior notice or a hearing, the district court sua sponte revoked Cherry’s pro hac…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. TruebloodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Herbert BaylinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence SutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Belue v. LeventhalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Larry Marshak v. Gino TonettiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.