Legal Opinion

Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence Sutter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2005No. 03-35093PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

While driving a Ford pick-up truck, plaintiff Mark Lasar was involved in a rollover accident. Lasar subsequently brought a products liability damages action against Ford Motor Company. This appeal arises from sanctions that the district court levied against Ford and its counsel, Lawrence Sutter, for statements that Sutter made during his opening statement to the jury that ultimately resulted in a mistrial.

In imposing sanctions, the district court determined that Sutter violated two pretrial in limine orders prohibiting Ford from introducing evidence that Lasar had been…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Mendez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. America Unites for Kids v. Sylvia RousseauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Shell Offshore Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Timothy Blixseth v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Sheller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API