Legal Opinion

Hullett v. Cousin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2003No. CV-01-0407-PRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Under Arizona’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”), a transfer “is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the transfer” if, as a result of the transfer, the debtor becomes insolvent and the transfer was not made in exchange for “reasonably equivalent value.” Ariz.Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 44-1005 (1994). The central issue in this case is whether an unknown, unasserted, and presumably time-barred claim rendered a partnership insolvent when the partnership transferred its assets. We hold that such a claim must be disregarded if found to be time-barred…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Walk v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Official Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury v. Sealed Air Corp. (In Re W.R. Grace & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. Rountree v. Nunnery (In Re Rountree)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  4. Crosby-Garbotz v. Hon. fell/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Warne Investments, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API