Hullett v. Cousin
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 Under Arizona’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”), a transfer “is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the transfer” if, as a result of the transfer, the debtor becomes insolvent and the transfer was not made in exchange for “reasonably equivalent value.” Ariz.Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 44-1005 (1994). The central issue in this case is whether an unknown, unasserted, and presumably time-barred claim rendered a partnership insolvent when the partnership transferred its assets. We hold that such a claim must be disregarded if found to be time-barred…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Walk v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Official Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury v. Sealed Air Corp. (In Re W.R. Grace & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Rountree v. Nunnery (In Re Rountree)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Crosby-Garbotz v. Hon. fell/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- Warne Investments, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.