Legal Opinion

Wright v. Medlar

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1935No. 24757PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. This action was commenced in the district court of Muskogee county by Forry F. Med-lar and Elizabeth D. Medlar against LeRoy A. Wright and Marie F. Wright to recover certain sums of money paid upon the purchase price of certain shares of the capital stock of the Muskogee Paint & Glass Company, a corporation.

Plaintiffs, in their petition, allege that prior and up to the time of the transaction complained of, the plaintiff Forry F. Medlar was employed as a salesman of wholesale stocks of paints, varnishes, and other goods…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Dunn v. Claunch, Gilliland and DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Rock v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Downtown Chevrolet Co. v. NiccumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Noah v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Branding Iron Country Club, Inc. v. Concho Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API