Legal Opinion

In Re Hillis

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 24, 2004No. 321,2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Edmund M. Hillis, Assistant Public Defender, petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition or certiorari challenging the authority of a Superior Court judge to sanction him through the imposition of costs of transporting prisoners to court and confining him for one hour to a courthouse “holding area.” Hillis contends that: (i) a trial judge does not have the authority, absent a finding of contempt, to impose on defendant’s counsel the costs of transporting an incarcerated defendant to court; (ii) a trial judge does not have the authority, absent a finding of contempt, to incarcerate counsel;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. Lasalle v. Vogel, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. In re HillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  5. In Re Joseph A. HurleySupreme Court of Delaware · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API