In Re Hillis
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
Edmund M. Hillis, Assistant Public Defender, petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition or certiorari challenging the authority of a Superior Court judge to sanction him through the imposition of costs of transporting prisoners to court and confining him for one hour to a courthouse “holding area.” Hillis contends that: (i) a trial judge does not have the authority, absent a finding of contempt, to impose on defendant’s counsel the costs of transporting an incarcerated defendant to court; (ii) a trial judge does not have the authority, absent a finding of contempt, to incarcerate counsel;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Lasalle v. Vogel, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re HillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- In Re Joseph A. HurleySupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.