Hicks v. State

JACOBS, Justice.

Ricky Hicks (“Hicks”), the defendant-below, appeals from a Superior Court judgment of conviction following a jury trial. Hicks claims that the Superior Court reversibly erred in three respects, namely: (i) by denying Hicks’ motion for a new trial claiming newly discovered evidence; (n) by excluding evidence of a prior crime committed by the State’s trial witness; and (iii) by denying Hicks’ request to impeach the State’s expert. 1 We conclude that the Superior Court committed no error. Therefore, we affirm.

FACTS

On October 28, 2004, Delaware State Police Officer Lance Skinner…