Legal Opinion

Caudle v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1931No. L-112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The plaintiff brings suit to recover the difference in rental and subsistence allowances between those of an officer without dependents, in which status he had been paid, and an officer with a dependent mother, from June 8, 1923, to September 19, 1924.

His claim is based on sections 4, 5, and 6 of the act of June 10, 1922 (42 Stat. 628), as amended by the act of May 31, 1924 (43 Stat. 250).

The plaintiff’s mother during the period of the claim was over fifty-two years of age and owned no property of any kind. Her living expenses during the period in question averaged around $100 per month, of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. Haas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Stewart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. Wilmeth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Delaware Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  4. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Giessler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API