Legal Opinion

Haas v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 4, 1929No. H-422PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeeeN, Judge

The plaintiff, who is a naval offeer and on active duty from July 1, 1924, to June 30, 1927, and thereafter, brings this suit to recover an allowance for a mother alleged to be dependent upon him, making the claim under the act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 625. The case turns upon the construction of section 4 of the statute, which reads as follows:

“ That the term ‘ dependent ’ * * * shall also include the mother of the officer, provided she is in fact dependent on him for her chief support.”

The facts further show that the plaintiff’s mother is not in any way fitted to engage in any gainful…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Caudle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. Tricou v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Freeland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. Samouce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. Updegraff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API