Legal Opinion

Jewett v. Patt

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1979No. 9341PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

Roy and Lorene Jewett commenced this action for professional malpractice against attorney Seymour Patt. They joined his wife, Stevie, as a defendant alleging that Seymour’s negligence occurred while he was acting on behalf of the community. The district court dismissed the action without prejudice as to Seymour, but with prejudice as to Stevie. We affirm.

1. On March 10, 1972, the Jewetts retained attorney Patt to recover damages sustained in an automobile accident on August 13, 1971. The adverse driver was Fred Marquardson. That action was not commenced until…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Randono v. TurkNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Sorenson v. PavlikowskiNevada Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Semenza v. Nevada Medical Liability InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hewitt v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lawler v. Guild, Hagen & Clark, Ltd. (In Re Lawler)District Court, N.D. Texas · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API